This news has been received from:

All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.

Carl Pope September 16, 2020 9:00AM (UTC)

The clash between Donald Trump and Jo Biden over the roots of the West's apocalyptic fire season has missed the crucial point – perhaps because neither candidate is targeting the solidly Democratic Pacific Coast.

Biden justly called Trump a "climate arsonist," after four years of desperate efforts to accelerate climate change and convince the American people to ignore its threats.

Trump is wrong to blame state forest management policies for the fires. But a major source of the conflagration was a misguided national century of treating fire, not fuel, as the enemy in the arid West, so arguably the president is stumbling around an important reality. 


But while climate change is igniting the great burn, and fire suppression is fueling it, communities faced with flames need investments that protect and counteract short-term threats, even while long-term climate and fuels management solutions can be implemented.

Neither candidate has offered such a package of meaningful short term solutions — but they exist. Nor has either offered equivalent investments to protect flood-prone communities in the heartland, or hurricane-threatened coastal residents. All three, which taken together loom over 25% of the U.S. population, desperately need federal leadership.)

Smoke and fire have driven me from a family retreat north of San Francisco four times in the last three years. I've experienced the searing expansion of the fire season. Overstocked, understory-clogged woodlands stretch as far as my eyes can see. We must face these problems. But by the time we do, even if we are diligent, the cost in communities burned, economies shattered and lives lost is simply too high. 


While confronting the root causes, we must also minimize the price that blameless communities pay for all our past errors. That means making community protection the centerpiece of our fire response in the arid West, just as we make it the centerpiece of our flood control policies in the heartland and our hurricane preparation along the coasts.

In 1933 Franklin D. Roosevelt inherited the Dust Bowl, which was itself a complex, multi-causal ecological disaster. He inaugurated a series of investments, focused on the Soil Conservation Service, that in five years cut wind erosion by 50%.  It began not with policies, but with capacities.

This year's fires were not ignited by utility poles — mostly lightning was the igniter, as it has been for millennia. No easy fix there. Nor were the biggest fires in California turbocharged by high winds. So the problem was not transmission, meaning the way the fires spread. And unlike some of the fires in Oregon, California's were not even fire tornadoes exploding in previously moist and densely grown canyons. Some raced across land that had burned only three years ago. 


So why did they spread so far and so fast?

There simply weren't enough Pulaskis on the ground. (It's a firefighting hand tool that combines an ax and an adze, whose invention is credited to legendary Forest Service ranger Ed Pulaski.) There never are. Adequate resources, professionally deployed, are the key to community protection. 


We simply don't take rural fire management seriously, fund it adequately or staff it professionally. The full-time staff of the U.S. Forest Service, or state agencies like California's Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, universally known as Cal Fire, are superb. But the full-time firefighting cadre in the Forest Service, with 191 million acres to protect is fewer than 5,000 strong, with only 5,000 more part-timers available. By contrast, New York City's fire department has almost 11,000 full time firefighters for 200,000 acres.

Cal Fire also has fewer than 5,000 full-time firefighters. It supplements them with 5,000 seasonal staff and a normally roughly equal number of prison inmates — but this year only half the number of inmates were available, thanks to the pandemic. Oregon needed twice as many firefighters as it had available, and scrambled to find National Guard troops to fill the gap. 

Time and time again, reports have  indicated that for many of this year's fires, efforts to contain their early spread were not even attempted. Firefighters were only able to stop imminent threats to lives and communities, and not always those if the communities were small or remote.New fires in remote areas simply had to wait.


There is a surprisingly simple, uncontroversial and — I, at least, will argue — clearly affordable solution.  

Take rural fire management seriously. Treat it like the Netherlands treats flood control: as a vital public service. Fund it appropriately, staff it professionally, and focus on preventing fires from reaching communities, not fighting them after they do. This is the heart of the concept of Community Protection. Imagine that the rural West, instead of relying upon a ramshackle, pulled-together seasonal fire force — sometimes reliant on prisons or National Guard units — could call upon a nationally integrated Fire Service Corps. It might perhaps mobilize 100,000 full-time fire professionals, federal, state and local. Most of the year these professionals, like Roosevelt's Soil Conservation Service, would help rural communities properly manage fuel loads, ensure building safety and other facets of community fire risk (just as fire departments in cities do).  

When fire season comes — perhaps early, as it did this year — the first lightning storm to ignite multiple fires would not have sent Washington, Oregon and California scrambling to find needed firefighters. The Fire Service Corps would simply shift from work they might have been doing cutting brush on the outskirts of Berryessa Estates, California, to suppressing the Hennessey Fire and its companions in their first hours, so that the flames never got close to homes. And because the Service Corps would have deployed extensive controlled burning in key corridors, the fire would have largely followed predictable pathways where the corps, perhaps supplemented with seasonal and convict trainees, could have been ready to erect fire lines. 


Can we afford this? Since federal, state and local governments — along with insurance companies — already pay for our fire management failures, they can in fact profit from investment in fire management success. Cal Fire's budget is $2.3 billion. The 2017-2018 fire seasons cost the state $40 billion. Imagine that the California portion of the budget for an integrated federal-state-local Fire Service Corps is $10 billion, and that with this enhanced investment we could cut the state's long-term fire damage bill in half, from $20 billion to $10 billion. Every year we would save $2.3 billion on total fire management costs — and all of the uncounted costs of wildfire from lost human lives, damaged health and lost business activity would be additional benefits.  

How best to deploy the enhanced capacity of a Fire Service Corps would be a local decision, and would require extensive trial and error, just as the Soil Conservation Service did not begin with a detailed blueprint to stop the Dust Bowl. But I would argue that any serious effort to put community protection at the heart of a new American response to fire — or to floods and storms — must begin by creating an institution with the mission, the capacity and the professionalism to do whatever the crisis requires.

Carl Pope

Carl Pope is the co-author of "Climate of Hope: How Cities, Businesses, and Citizens Can Save the Planet." He is the former CEO and chairman of the Sierra Club.


News Source:

Tags: california commentary donald trump firefighters joe biden oregon wildfires fire management

Tough test for tough times: US Open at haunting Winged Foot

Next News:

UFC free fight: Tyron Woodley submits Darren Till, earns black belt after win

Actors you didnt know were also musicians Warning: Study Shows the 2020 Recession Could Cut Your Retirement Income by 10 Percentage Points UFC free fight: Tyron Woodley submits Darren Till, earns black belt after win

In perhaps Tyron Woodley‘s best performance to date, the former UFC welterweight champion was able to show off his well-rounded game.

© Provided by MMAJunkie

Woodley put his title on the line against then unbeaten rising star Darren Till in the main event of UFC 228. Despite being champ, Woodley was the betting underdog.

It was an aggressive start from Woodley, who charged at Till with a combination then quickly engaged in the clinch. But they were quickly separated, and for the rest of the round, both men were tentative to throw. Woodley initiated the clinch once more towards the end of the round, but they were broken up by the referee once again.

But in Round 2, Woodley clipped Till with a big right hand just 10 seconds in, unleashing a barrage of ground and pound. Till momentarily survived the onslaught, but as he was curling up to the side, Woodley latched onto his neck and sunk in a D’Arce choke to tap him out.

It was an emotional moment for Woodley, who was awarded his black belt after notching his first submission win in the UFC.

Woodley (19-5-1 MMA, 9-4-1 UFC) will look to snap his two-fight losing skid Saturday when he faces Colby Covington (15-2 MMA, 10-2 UFC) in the UFC on ESPN+ 36 main event, which takes place at the UFC Apex in Las Vegas.

Before he faces Covington, relive Woodley’s finish over Till in the video above.


Khabib Nurmagomedov considers Muhammad Ali comparisons to be 'inappropriate'

Johnny Walker thinks he found home with SBG Ireland ahead of UFC on ESPN+ 33

Kevin Holland thought he was fighting Darren Till – not Darren Stewart – at UFC on ESPN+ 36

Skidding Donald Cerrone shuts down retirement talk: 'I'm going to leave when I'm done'

Invicta FC 42 weigh-in results: COVID scratches two fights, but title bout is on

Other News

  • Peru President Faces Impeachment Vote Amid Pandemic Turmoil
  • Peru president faces impeachment vote amid pandemic turmoil
  • U. of Oklahoma Removes Tribute to Retired Faculty Because It Exclusively Includes White Male Faces
  • Princeton faces federal probe for saying racism is embedded there
  • Princeton faces federal probe for admitting racism remains embedded there
  • Princeton Faces Education Department Investigation After University President Says Racism Is Embedded In The School
  • Trump faces deep pessimism as election nears
  • Arizona Man Faces Attempted Murder Charge in Police Shooting
  • Asbury Park Teen Faces 10-Year Prison Sentence In Shooting Near Brick High School
  • Discussions Continue On Where Sanctioned Homeless Camp Should Be Located
  • AP-NORC poll: Trump faces deep pessimism as election nears
  • US-UK trade deal faces potential hurdles from Biden, Congress over Brexit fight
  • Kate Gosselin faces criminal complaint from ex-employee who claims TV star owes her $55K as she battles ex Jon over son
  • The Solution Committee Trailer: Jaden Smiths Snapchat Show to Discuss Voting, Racial Justice With Guest Celebs Lena Waithe, Yara Shahidi and More (Watch Video)
  • Bobby Boone has a solution for Black business owners with storefronts
  • ByteDances bid to keep most of TikTok faces major hurdles
  • Could washing your nose with IODINE protect you from COVID-19? Swabbing the virus with the antiseptic for 15 seconds completely killed it in lab study
  • No. 23 Appalachian State faces sharp young QB at Marshall
  • TikTok STILL faces ban as owners warn deal needs both US and China approval