Sep 17, 2020
Supervisor To SF Salon Owner Erica Kious: Placer County Would Welcome You With Open Arms
This news has been received from: cbslocal.com
All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.
AUBURN (CBS13) — A supervisor has sent an open letter to the San Francisco salon owner at the center of a controversial visit involving House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, urging the businesswoman to set up shop in Placer County.
Bonnie Gore represents Placer County’s District 1. On Wednesday, she revealed that she had sent a letter to Erica Kious, the owner of eSalon on Union Street in San Francisco.
“Our arms are open to hard-working small business owners,” Gore wrote.
Kious had appear earlier Wednesday morning on a cable news network saying she didn’t yet know when or where she’d open up another salon.
Speaker Pelosi’s indoor styling appointment at Kious’ salon set off a firestorm of controversy, with many people critical of how Pelosi flouted San Francisco’s temporary ban of indoor personal care services amid the coronavirus pandemic.
Kious’ own stylist backed up Pelosi’s claim that the visit was a set up. Kious denied setting her up, however, and shot back that the Speaker was trying to find a scapegoat.
Last week, due to the fallout from the controversy, Kious told Fox News that she would be closing the salon that Pelosi visited.
Hair salons and barbershops, under California’s updated reopening plan, can now operate indoors with modifications.
News Source: cbslocal.com
White bar owner charged with killing black protester James Scurlock despite initial ‘self defense’ determination
A WHITE bar owner has been charged with killing black protester James Scurlock despite the initial "self defense" determination.
In Omaha, Douglas County Attorney Don Kleine initially decided Gardner, the bar owner, acted in self-defense after he reviewed video of the incident and witness statements in the days after the shooting, but he asked the grand jury to examine the case after his decision was criticized because he wanted people to have faith in the justice system.
On Tuesday, Special Prosecutor Frederick Franklin said that additional evidence from Gardner’s phone and his Facebook Messenger account, along with video from inside his bar, shed light on his intent the night of the shooting.
He said the new evidence undermines the self-defense theory although he wouldn’t provide specifics of exactly what it showed.
Gardner was charged with manslaughter, attempted assault, making terroristic threats and using a gun to commit a felony.
His attorney, Stu Dornan, didn't respond to phone messages from The Associated Press on Wednesday.
Legal experts say prosecutors may have a difficult time securing a conviction because the case will hinge on what both men intended to do that night.3James Scurlock, 22, was shot on May 30Credit: Twitter
"Obviously the video tape evidence is going to be crucial in trying to determine whether or not Gardner believed that his life or his person were in grave danger under the circumstances," said longtime Nebraska criminal attorney Clarence Mock, who has also served as a special prosecutor before.
The shooting happened outside Gardner’s bar in downtown Omaha as he sought to ward off any theft or property damage.
In June, officials played surveillance video that seemed to show words exchanged between Gardner, his father and protesters after the windows of his bar were broken. Gardner flashed the gun but then backed away.
Gardner was shoved to the ground by two people before he fired two shots, sending people scrambling.
Scurlock then jumped on Gardner's back and was shot by Gardner.
While there was no audio with the video, Kleine said Gardner warned Scurlock to get off of him several times before he fired the fatal shot.3The shooting happened outside Gardner’s bar in downtown Omaha
Creighton University law school professor Raneta Mack said determining whether Scurlock was trying to stop Gardner from hurting anyone or whether he was trying to harm Gardner could be key in the case.
"If Mr. Scurlock was coming to the defense of his friends or even members of the general public and that is why he was grabbing Gardner and putting him into a chokehold, then Gardner does not have a right of self defense," said Mack, who has taught criminal law for nearly three decades.
But Cohen said this will be a tough case for prosecutors because jurors tend to give defendants some benefit of the doubt when they were facing a chaotic situation.
"There is a deference accorded to those who are perceived by a jury as lawfully protecting their property," Cohen said.
Of course, more evidence will be needed at trial to prove Gardner is guilty than what is required at this stage in the process.Most read in NewsHUNTED DOWN'Pedo, 35, rapes girl, 12, after finding home using app’s location feature'FAMILY SLAUGHTERDad ‘shot dead baby & toddler & killed himself after vowing to take kids’NURSERY HORRORSchoolmates find little boy dead on playground slide after freak accident'SNATCHED FROM HOME' Desperate search as ‘two boys, 7 and 9, are snatched from bedroom’NOWHERE'S SAFEMarried cops' home BLASTED by gunmen while newborn baby was inside'GRUESOME RAPE'Girl, 19, gang-raped by at least 11 MEN and thrown to death off building
But the fact that Gardner has been charged means that the community will be able to learn more about what happened that night.
Scurlock’s death inspired protests in Omaha in the days after prosecutors initially declined to file charges.
"This will allow people to understand how the system works and be able to see for themselves what evidence the prosecution has and what evidence the defense presents to have maybe a greater understanding about what happened during the night of Mr. Scurlock’s death," Mock said.