Sep 17, 2020
San Francisco State University defends hosting talk by Palestinian militant Leila Khaled who hijacked a flight to New York City after the school promoted the event as 'an historic encounter with a feminist icon'
This news has been received from: dailymail.co.uk
All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.
The president of San Francisco State University has defended her decision to allow a talk to go ahead featuring Palestinian militant, Leila Khaled, who was among those to hijack a flight to New York City in the 1970s.
Khaled is scheduled to speak at a virtual class event hosted by the university next week despite outrage and objections from Jewish students and groups who have said they are 'deeply distressed' by her inclusion.
The event, which is titled 'Whose Narratives? Gender, Justice and Resistance', has been organized by the university's Arab and Muslim Ethnicities and Diasporas Studies program.
The talk has been billed as a 'historic roundtable conversation with Palestinian feminist, militant and leader', according to one of the advertisements.
Khaled is a member of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, which is a group designated by the US Department of State as a terror organization.
Lynn Mahoney, the president of San Francisco State University, has defended her decision to allow a talk to go ahead featuring Palestinian militant, Leila Khaled, who was among those to hijack a flight to New York City in the 1970s
The 76-year-old also took part in two plane hijackings in 1969 and 1970. She was arrested in London after the second flight, which was travelling from Amsterdam to New York City, was rerouted.
The militant ended up being swapped in a prisoner exchange for civilian hostages that were taken by the terror group in a separate incident.
After facing objections from Jewish students over Khaled's scheduled appearance, the university's president Lynn Mahoney defended her decision to allow the talk to go ahead.
In an op-ed published by the Jewish News, Mahoney said she condemned hate but welcomed a diversity of opinions.
'San Francisco State University is again at the center of a national discussion about the boundaries and consequences of freedom of expression, this time brought about because two faculty members have invited Leila Khaled to participate in a virtual class discussion,' Mahoney said.
'Let me be clear: I condemn the glorification of terrorism and use of violence against unarmed civilians. I strongly condemn antisemitism and other hateful ideologies that marginalize people based on their identities, origins or beliefs.
The event, which is titled 'Whose Narratives? Gender, Justice and Resistance', has been organized by the university's Arab and Muslim Ethnicities and Diasporas Studies program. The talk has been billed as a 'historic roundtable conversation with Palestinian feminist, militant and leader', according to one of the advertisements.
Khaled is a member of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, which is a group designated by the US Department of State as a terror organization
'At the same time, I represent a public university, which is committed to academic freedom and the ability of faculty to conduct their teaching and scholarship without censorship.
'Our university is among the most diverse in the nation, where students frequently encounter divergent viewpoints and world views, which plays an essential role in the development of the burgeoning minds of our students. It is our obligation to utilize moments such as these to heap on more learning, engage in more debate, and challenge viewpoints and assumptions.
'Rather than stifle speech, we must encourage robust questioning and dissent, and ensure that our students and faculty are free from retaliation or censorship for doing so.'
She said a recent meeting she had with students had 'enhanced my appreciation for the deeply painful impact of this upcoming presenter, as well as past campus experiences'.
In open letter to Mahoney, students affiliated with SF Hillel - a Jewish student life group associated with the school - said that while they appreciate academic freedom they also expect academic responsibility.
Rabab Ibrahim Abdulhadi, one of the professors who organized the talk, penned a Facebook post last month saying she was honored to host Khaled, who she described as a 'revolutionary Palestinian militant and feminist icon'
They wrote that they are 'still deeply distressed by this blatant violation of that responsibility' by allowing Khaled to speak.
'We are worried about the normalization of violent rhetoric. We live in a world with rising violent hate crime rates against Jews and other minority communities, where divisive rhetoric emboldens teenagers to take up arms and threaten acts of violence.
'Seeing someone who engaged in terror be held up as a role model, we are worried about the potential for hateful or dangerous backlash.'
Rabab Ibrahim Abdulhadi, one of the professors who organized the talk, penned a Facebook post last month saying she was honored to host Khaled, who she described as a 'revolutionary Palestinian militant and feminist icon'.
'I wanted to grow up to become another Leila Khaled,' the professor wrote. 'Her steadfastness, resilience and resistance has and continues to be a huge inspiration to me and to generations of Palestinian women.'
Abdulhadi acknowledged that 'Zionist groups will undoubtedly become bothered again'.
'They will ask the university to punish us for bringing the voices of marginalized communities to the fore and for shining a light on what oppression and resistance mean.'
News Source: dailymail.co.uk
Meghan Markle showed ‘clear signs of anger’ during talk at £10k-a-head event, claims body language expert
MEGHAN Markle showed "clear signs of anger" during a recent women's summit interview with Fortune editor Ellen McGirt, claims a body language expert.
The Duchess of Sussex , 39, spoke at Fortune's Most Powerful Women Summit by video link, opting for a "sit-down" chat at the £10k-a-head event on Tuesday.
⚠️ Read our Meghan and Harry blog for the latest news on the Royal couple4Meghan showed "clear signs of anger" says body language expert Judi James Credit: @FortuneMPW
In the chat, Meghan - who has come under fire over her use of private jets while promoting environmental causes in the past - insisted she is "not controversial" and said "what ends up being inflammatory is people's interpretation".
Body language expert Judi James told Mirror Online that Meghan put on a "slightly defensive" display during Tuesday's summit, adding that she spoke with a "misunderstood tone".
Judi explained that "splaying out" on the sofa with her shirt sleeves pulled up is an indication that she "wants to get down to business" while trying to be "authentic".
She said: "The splaying and pit-baring looks confident and gently powerful, as does the preen gesture with her hair, while the very subtle lower jaw-jut and a few sharp, accelerated blinks hint at some anger, although her tone overall signals bewilderment from a woman who tells us she has not been controversial in what she says in the past"4Meghan put on a "slightly defensive" display during the Fortune's Most Powerful Women Summit on TuesdayCredit: @FortuneMPW 4Meghan tuned in via video call and opted for an interview-style chatCredit: @FortuneMPW
Judi also added that Meghan "emphasizes her emotional side again" with the mention of tears.
What's more, the act of Meghan looking away dramatically to consider her thoughts and the shaking of her head suggests "a sense of bewilderment or disbelief."
The Duchess spoke at the virtual summit from the Santa Monica mansion she and Prince Harry bought last month.The Duchess spoke at the virtual summit from the Santa Monica mansion she and Prince Harry bought last month
Meghan also spoke about the Sussexes' non-profit organisation Archewell, which she said aims to "ensure that we are helping foster healthy positive communities - online and off".
She said: "To see how you are propagating hate, whether passively or actively; to see how you are clicking on things that are contributing to an industry that is really toxic for so many of us, especially as parents.
"And when you know something is wrong, reporting it, it, talking about it, ensuring that the facts are getting out there. I think that is one clear tangible thing that everyone could be doing."Most read in CelebrityTALKING YAPPiers Morgan slams 'whining' Meghan & Prince Harry after Duchess' interviewELON WAY TO GOElon Musk says humans need to move to Mars as Sun will one day engulf EarthCéline's transformationCéline Dion weight loss - how did the singer lose weight?APPLE CRUMBLEWhich iPhones are 'obsolete' and 'dangerous' in 2020? The full listPOODLE TRANSLATEWhat your dog's behaviour really means - from tail wags to rolling overBRAIN WORKOUTFiendishly tricky puzzle asks you to spot mouse hiding but can you find it? Meghan Markle says she 'doesn't listen to noise' in talk at £10k-a-head conference