Sep 17, 2020
Judges scrutinize suit’s claims in Harvard racial bias case
This news has been received from: Associated Press
All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.
BOSTON (AP) — A panel of appeals court judges on Wednesday repeatedly challenged the legal claims of a group that accuses Harvard University of intentional discrimination against Asian American students who apply to the Ivy League school.
The three-judge panel of the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston appeared skeptical of arguments made by Students for Fair Admissions, which says Harvard imposes a “racial penalty” on Asian Americans.When a lawyer for the group accused the school of racial stereotyping against Asian American applicants, a judge interrupted and questioned the basis of the claim.
“Where is the evidence of racial profiling here?” Judge Juan Torruella asked.
The panel is expected to make a decision on the case in coming weeks. Either way, legal experts believe the case will probably end up before the Supreme Court.
Students for Fair Admissions is asking the appeals court to overturn a trial-level judge’s 2019 decision finding that Harvard does not intentionally discriminate against Asian Americans. U.S. District Judge Allison D. Burroughs issued the decision in October after a three-week trial.
In her ruling, Burroughs said Harvard’s admissions process is “not perfect” but concluded that there was “no evidence of any racial animus whatsoever.” She ruled that other factors beyond bias could explain why Harvard accepts Asian American students at lower rates than students of other races.
The group’s lawsuit alleges that Harvard admissions officers use a subjective “personal rating” assigned to each student to discriminate against Asian Americans. Using six years of admissions data, the group found that Asian American applicants averaged the highest scores in an academic rating but received the lowest personal ratings, and that they were admitted at lower rates.
Harvard denies any bias and defends its use of race in the application process. The school says race is one of many factors considered and that at most it provides a “tip” in favor of underrepresented students. It says the university has a “compelling interest” in attracting a diverse student body to its campus.
Presenting the case to judges, a lawyer for the group said Harvard’s practices go beyond the limited consideration of race that has been upheld by the Supreme Court. Attorney William Consovoy said the school’s efforts to keep a similar racial makeup among students from year to year amounts to illegal racial balancing.
“The statistical evidence in this case showed that the personal rating discriminates against Asian Americans in a statistically significant way,” Consovoy said.
But Judge Sandra L. Lynch challenged that allegation, saying that, presented with competing statistical models from both sides, the trial court judge sided with Harvard’s.
“The district court actually found that Harvard’s statistical model was the more reliable one,” Lynch said. “So, again, I’m just trying to get your argument.” Consovoy argued that both models were deemed credible.
A representative for the U.S. Justice Department spoke in support of Students for Fair Admissions on Wednesday, arguing that race “pervades every aspect” of Harvard’s admissions process. Eric S. Dreiband, assistant attorney general for the Civil Rights Division, said the school’s admissions process “unduly burdens” Asian American applicants compared to white applicants.
The Trump administration has opposed the use of race at Harvard and other colleges across the U.S. Last month, the Justice Department found that Yale University discriminates against Asian American and white applicants. The finding, which resulted from a two-year inquiry, was rejected by Yale as “meritless” and “hasty.”
As evidence, the group points to a U.S. Education Department investigation into Harvard’s admissions practices in the 1990s. In that case, the agency also explored whether Harvard discriminates against Asian Americans. The school was ultimately cleared.
Speaking on behalf of the university Wednesday, attorney Seth Waxman said the school’s personal rating, which was also examined during the federal inquiry, has “assumed a Frankenstein-like significance.” But he argued that the 1990s investigation only helps Harvard’s case.
“It reached the exact same conclusion, based on its review of all the evidence, that Judge Burroughs did,” he said.
News Source: Associated Press
Opinion: As the SEC pushed through with patience, the Big Ten faltered in its handling of COVID-19
Songs we’d love to hear Beyoncé cover 7 Reasons Not to Move When You Retire Opinion: As the SEC pushed through with patience, the Big Ten faltered in its handling of COVID-19
The stress was unrelenting, and Greg Sankey’s head pounded.Why the Big Tens return needed to happen to legitimize CFP and 2020 champion USA TODAY SPORTS See more videos SHARE SHARE TWEET SHARE EMAIL What to watch next
Bakersfield College breaking racial barriers in the athletics departmentKERO Bakersfield, CA
Lorenzen Wright’s family is still waiting for justice: Part 11ABC News
Protesters call for Rootstown superintendents resignation after football coach leavesWKYC-TV Cleveland
Fire Fight Against Bobcat Fire Continues In Angeles National ForestCBS Los Angeles
Highlights and interviews from Vero Beach’s win against Port St. LucieThe St. Lucie News-Tribune
Shower Power helping feed the homelessWAPT Jackson
Fire chief honored at Lovelands homecoming game against Little MiamiWLWT Cincinnati
Rootstown Friday night football game met with protest over racial slur incidentWEWS Cleveland, OH
Indiana High School Football Highlights: Center Grove 47, North Central 0Indianapolis Star
Indiana High School Football Highlights: Carmel 36, Lawrence North 34Indianapolis Star
Indiana High School Football Highlights: Cathedral 25, St. Xavier (Ohio) 22Indianapolis Star
West Bloomfield (MI) RB Donovan Edwards reacts to big win over Oak ParkSMG
HS GameTime: Meet Nathan McEIroy Trinity quarterbackWHAS-TV Louisville
WATCH: Anderson football players - Were finally living up the potentialCincinnati Enquirer
Trinity coaches, players remember Steven TompkinsWHAS-TV Louisville
Texas A&M gives preview of game day safety at Kyle FieldKAGS-TV Waco-Temple-Bryan
- Bakersfield College breaking racial barriers in the athletics department Bakersfield College breaking racial barriers in the athletics department KERO Bakersfield, CA
- Lorenzen Wright’s family is still waiting for justice: Part 11 The trial for Billy Ray Turner, charged in Wright’s murder, is scheduled for this fall but it’s unlikely it will happen due to COVID-19 precautions. He has pleaded not guilty. ABC News
- Protesters call for Rootstown superintendents resignation after football coach leaves Coach Troy Spiker resigned last week after Superintendent Andrew Hawkins overturned his discipline of a player. The student had allegedly used racial slurs. WKYC-TV Cleveland
College football’s landscape was changing at a dizzying pace before the SEC commissioner’s eyes. The 2020 season now hung in the balance and the pressure from all sides began to mount.
First, the Big Ten moved to a conference-only schedule in early July, which blindsided many of the sport’s power brokers. Then, on Aug. 11, the league elected to postpone fall sports indefinitely and focus on playing football at some point in 2021. Soon thereafter, the Pac-12 announced its own shutdown, riding the wave of cancellations that detonated schedules.
Start the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.
Sankey reached for not one Aleve PM, but two.
With blood rushing to his head, he tried to remain as calm and deliberate as he had been ever since March, when his job became an exercise in crisis management with the onset ofa global pandemic. As Sankey recalled that hectic period Tuesday on the eve of the Big Ten’s decision to reinstate its football season for the Oct. 23-24 weekend, he did so comfortably reassured about choices he made.© Junfu Han, Detroit Free Press Michigan football head coach Jim Harbaugh, holding the hand of his daughter Addie, marches with players, their parents and supporters outside Michigan Stadium in Ann Arbor, to protest the postponement of the fall football season on Sept. 5, 2020.
Finding a way to play was central to Sankey’s thinking as he contemplated what the absence of a season would mean for the student-athletes he governed.
“That was their time,” he said. “So part of my personal thinking was the responsibility was to provide that opportunity — not that I can guarantee it. In fact, I very much cannot guarantee anything in this environment. I am open and honest about that reality. But I had the responsibility to try because it’s now somebody else’s time this year.”