This news has been received from:

All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.

Reuters September 16, 2020 0 Comments

The United States said on Wednesday it plans to impose sanctions on those who violate a U.N. arms embargo on Iran, which Washington says will now stay in place instead of expiring in October as agreed under a 2015 nuclear deal.

U.S. Special Representative for Venezuela and Iran Elliott Abrams said Washington could deny access to the U.

S. market to anyone who trades in weapons with Iran, which President Donald Trump’s administration accuses of seeking to develop nuclear weapons.

Iran has denied it is developing nuclear weapons.

In 2018 Trump quit the Iran nuclear deal – under which Tehran limited its nuclear activities in return for sanctions relief – and reimposed U.S. sanctions. Washington also says it has triggered a return of all U.N. sanctions on Iran, which would take effect this weekend.

But the other parties to the nuclear deal – Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia – and most of the U.N. Security Council have said they do not believe the United States can reimpose the U.N. sanctions.

“It’s like pulling a trigger and no bullet comes out,” a senior U.N. Security Council diplomat said on condition of anonymity. “There will be no snapback, the sanctions will remain suspended, the JCPOA (nuclear deal) will remain in place.”

Asked if Washington is “making concrete plans now for secondary sanctions” to enforce the arms embargo, Abrams told reporters: “We are, in many ways, and we will have some announcements over the weekend and more announcements on Monday and then subsequent days next week.”

Diplomats say few nations are likely to reimpose U.N. sanctions on Iran.

Earlier on Wednesday, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told reporters, “We’ll do all the things we need to do to ensure that those sanctions are enforced.”

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani on Wednesday described the opposition to Washington as a “victory of the Iranian nation and the disgraceful defeat of the United States in activation of the snapback mechanism.”

(Reporting by Arshad Mohammed, Doina Chiacu and David Brunnstrom in Washington, Michelle Nichols at United Nations and Parisa Hafezi in Dubai; Writing by Arshad Mohammed; Editing by Matthew Lewis)

News Source:

Tags: iran iran deal mike pompeo

Thomas Takes US Open Lead With 65 on Soft, Kind Winged Foot

Next News:

Eliminating AFFH, the Obama-era housing rule: What it really means

REUTERS/Leah MillisPresident Donald Trump's elimination of AFFH reporting effectively takes local government out of fair housing action.When President Donald Trump tweeted that he was eliminating the 2015 Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) rule to protect the suburbs from low-income housing, and crime, it was clear he was using racial undertones that were offensive. However, what is worse are the actual actions taken behind the tweets that have resulted in substantial erosion of fair housing mechanisms in place among HUD-funded entities. Eliminating AFFH is significantly setting us back from doing meaningful work to address segregation and housing inequality in our country. 

The Fair Housing Act, primarily written by our own Vice President Walter Mondale, banned overt segregation in the United States in 1968. Personally, without it I would not have been able to grow up in the neighborhood I did as a Mexican American, given that the house I live in had a racial covenant attached to it in south Minneapolis restricting the purchase of the home to only those of the “Caucasian Race” (to learn more see PBS’  “Jim Crow of the North” and the Mapping Prejudice project). 

However, when President Barack Obama took office, America was arguably more segregated than before. A landmark study completed by Harvard professors Raj Chetty and Nathaniel Hendren statistically provided evidence that the ZIP code a child grows up in has a significant impact on their earnings in the future. The study confirmed that the results of segregation have detrimental effects on children who grow up in concentrated areas of poverty, giving urgency to affirmatively further fair housing. Thus, the Obama administration took action, and then-Housing Secretary Julian Castro championed the new AFFH rule.  

The AFFH rule required HUD-funded entities to use federal and local data to provide an extensive, intensely analytical report on barriers to fair housing called the Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH). This new report expanded what President Bill Clinton created in 1994 called the Analysis of Impediments (AI) that required HUD-funded jurisdictions to identify the barriers to fair housing choice.

AFH was different from AI because it required the use of data and mapping, and modernized the practice of identifying barriers to fair housing. For decades, HUD-Funded entities have conducted AIs and used the recommendations in those reports to justify investing federal funds to combat racist housing practices. Fair Housing paired testing, for instance, is a practice that would send a Black person and a White person to apply to rent the same unit. If the landlord discriminated, it was documented and could lead to legal action. The AI paved the way for local governments to take real action in dismantling segregation. The AFH from the Obama administration was the next step forward. It required local governments to think deeper about what they can do to integrate their communities.   

Article continues after advertisement

The rule would not have been an end-all, nor would it have (despite what Trump has said) changed the suburbs overnight. We do not have enough federal housing dollars to make that kind of dent in the housing market. However, AFFH pushed many fair housing practitioners out of their comfort zone into thinking about how to address these issues of housing, segregation, and poverty not in our limited view of just our city, but a more extensive, regional view.  

Tyler MorolesWhen Trump came into office and appointed Ben Carson as HUD secretary, things changed. One of Carson’s first actions was to pause any work on AFH and have all local governments go back to AIs. On July 23, 2020, Carson terminated Obama’s AFFH rule requiring the AFH report. The administration created a brand new rule called “Preserving Community and Neighborhood Choice.” Despite the name, this rule does not preserve neighborhood choice but instead restricts it. This rule eliminated not just the AFH that the Obama administration created but also the AI, effectively removing any meaningful reporting requirement on Fair Housing. The rule states that all local government and HUD-funded entities can just self report anything remotely related to fair housing, which would be enough. Local governments no longer have to conduct an analysis of segregation and develop actionable steps to address it. In many jurisdictions, this means no action on any fair housing issue. 

Trump’s elimination of AFFH reporting effectively takes local government out of fair housing action. If local governments have no interest in taking action on fair housing issues, they can do virtually nothing with limited recourse from the federal government and leave just community organizations to bear the brunt of the work. Trump’s tweets, although offensive, were only the tip of the iceberg. In a time when we are facing a looming eviction crisis, increasing housing inequality, skyrocketing rents, unprecedented job losses, and growing segregation, we need AFFH more than ever. 

Tyler Moroles is the co-chair of the Twin Cities Fair Housing Implementation Council, and he manages the Community Development Block Grant Program for Hennepin County and the County’s fair housing portfolio. He has worked in affordable housing for more than five years. The opinions expressed here are his own and are not a representation of the position of the county nor the FHIC.  


If you’re interested in joining the discussion, add your voice to the Comment section below — or consider writing a letter or a longer-form Community Voices commentary. (For more information about Community Voices, see our Submission Guidelines.)

Other News

  • Commentary: The Weak Case for Biden v. Trumps Strong Record
  • LA County Will Not Enforce Policy Banning Family Gatherings In Observance Of Jewish High Holidays
  • Wolf Administration Encourages Schools To Voluntarily Enforce Gathering Limits
  • What's the Real Impact of Trump's Action Against TikTok?
  • Turkeys Halkbank urges dismissal of Iran sanctions criminal case in U.S.
  • Trump eyes order sanctioning arms trade with Iran ahead of embargo expiration: Report
  • Joe Biden Stops Short Of Supporting National Mask Mandate, Says He Will Enforce Masks On Federal Property
  • Lebanese firm under U.S. sanctions accuses Washington of choking economy
  • Man Utd ace James Garner joins Watford on season-long loan transfer with club wanting him to get first-team action
  • The Foreign Policy Issues That Divide Trump and Biden
  • Biden changes answer on national mask mandate authority again, says he would not have power to enforce it
  • In Bumpy U.N. Dealings, Trump Found Backing on North Korea, Isolation on Iran
  • US seeks to pressure Russia into nuclear weapons treaty concessions before election
  • Buffalo school teaching students to question nuclear family as part of BLM-integrated curriculum: Tucker
  • Biden Punts on Nationwide Mask Mandate in CNN Town Hall, Says He Can Enforce Face-Covering Rule on Federal Property
  • Biden Acknowledges He Cant Enforce Federal Mask Mandates, But Would Enforce Mask Wearing on Federal Property
  • Trump wont attend UN General Assembly in person, Meadows says
  • Pompeo Expects ‘Every Nation’ to Comply With ‘Snapback’ Sanctions on Iran
  • Miami-Dade Mayor Carlos Gimenez Walks Back Order To Enforce Evictions