This news has been received from: FOX News

All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.

Shortly after Amy Coney Barrett was confirmed to the  U.S. Supreme Court on Monday, Democrats warned Republicans that they would regret their decision to hold a vote so closely to an election.

"The Republican majority is lighting its credibility on fire ... The next time the American people give Democrats a majority in this chamber, you will have forfeited the right to tell us how to run that majority," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.

Y., said during a floor speech Monday.


"My colleagues may regret this for a lot longer than they think," he added. 

Nominees once needed 60 votes to be confirmed, but Sen.  Mitch McConnell changed the standard in 2017 to allow for a simple majority. That move that allowed for the confirmation of President Trump's previous two nominees, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. 

Former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., first eliminated the 60-vote threshold in 2013 to overcome GOP stonewalling of President Obama's nominations to the lower courts and the executive branch. Known as invoking the "nuclear option" at the time, Reid kept the higher standard in place for the Supreme Court. 

The comments by Schumer appeared to be similar to those made by McConnell back in 2013 after the Democratic-controlled chamber eliminated the 60-vote threshold. 

“You’ll regret this, and you may regret it a lot sooner than you think,” McConnell said in 2013, according to the Hill.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi also released a statement criticizing Trump and the GOP Senate for "committed an act of supreme desperation" so close to Election Day. 

Pelosi argued the confirmation, which she called a manipulation, was made so Trump and Republicans could "achieve their years-long campaign to destroy Americans’ health care"

“The President’s Supreme Court manipulation threatens the very values and rights that define and distinguish our nation: a woman’s constitutional right to make her own medical decisions, the rights of LGBTQ Americans, the right of workers to organize and collectively bargain for fair wages, the future of our planet and environmental protections, voting rights and the right of every American to have a voice in our democracy," Pelosi wrote in a statement. 


Democratic senators warned that Republicans have lost the right to complain if they win back the majority.

"Will Democrats go to new, extraordinary lengths to maximize their power given the extraordinary lengths Republicans have gone to maximize their power? This is not a conversation that is ripe enough yet, but what do Republicans expect?" said Sen. Chris Murphy D-Conn., as part of the chamber’s debate over Barrett.

"Do we just unilaterally stand down and not choose to use the same tools that Republicans did in the majority? ... I think there are now new rules in the Senate, and I think Republicans have set them," he continued, according to the paper.

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., released a statement calling the confirmation a "sad day for the Senate and for the Court."

"My Republican colleagues put the rule of ‘because we can’ over the traditions and precedents of the Senate, the principles we hold dear as an institution, and the integrity of the federal judiciary," he said.


The Supreme Court said in a press release Monday that Barrett will be able to start her new role after Chief Justice John Roberts administers her judicial oath on Tuesday. Justice Clarence Thomas administered the constitutional oath at Monday's ceremony.

Fox News' Ronn Blitzer and Edmund DeMarche contributed to this report

David Aaro is a Reporter at Fox News Digital based in New York City.

News Source: FOX News

Tags: security innovation computers video games military tech security innovation computers video games military tech supreme court

Napoli to rename San Paolo stadium to Diego Armando Maradona in poignant tribute to legendary player after his death

Next News:

Andrew Cuomos in deep denial on his Supreme Court slapdown

Gov. Cuomo calls his slapdown by the Supreme Court “moot” and “irrelevant.” Bull.

Since the ruling only blocked enforcement of his tough restrictions on houses of worship in orange and red zones, and the parties who sued are no longer in such zones, the gov argues that it doesn’t count. In fact, it sets a serious precedent against his insistence on treating religious institutions more harshly than secular ones.

The court ruled 5-4 in favor of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn and a group of Orthodox Jewish synagogues who argued that Cuomo’s rules unfairly targeted them, violating the Constitution’s guarantee of religious freedom.

The gov had barred attendance of more than 10 people at religious services in a red zone and 25 in an orange zone — no matter how big the church, mosque or temple. Now he insists the ruling is “more illustrative of the Supreme Court than anything else” because Justice Amy Coney Barrett replaced the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

see also
Supreme Court says Cuomo cant set COVID-19 capacity limits on churches The Supreme Court late Wednesday temporarily blocked Gov. Andrew Cuomo...

But Cuomo’s limits far exceeded those the court had allowed back in May and July. California limited attendance to 25 percent of building capacity or 100 attendees, whichever was lower. And Nevada set a 50-person limit.

Justice Neil Gorsuch scorched Cuomo’s double standards: “It is time — past time — to make plain that, while the pandemic poses many grave challenges, there is no world in which the Constitution tolerates color-coded executive edicts that reopen liquor stores and bike shops but shutter churches, synagogues and mosques,” he wrote.

And the gov’s burden hit deep. Remote services are no real substitute for in-person ones: You can’t receive communion via Zoom.

Rep-elect Nicole Malliotakis (R-SI/Brooklyn) noted the perfect timing of the court’s ruling: “It is fitting that the Court’s decision was made on the eve of Thanksgiving, a holiday founded by Pilgrims who settled in North America in search of religious freedom.” Bingo.

Filed under andrew cuomo ,  churches ,  Coronavirus ,  editorial ,  rulings ,  supreme court ,  11/27/20

Other News

  • Who is Nate Robinson? NBA career earnings, slam dunk titles sudden boxing career
  • LIVE UPDATES: Trump campaign eyes Supreme Court after appeals panel tosses Pa. fraud case
  • Amistad Project Asks Michigan Supreme Court to Preserve Evidence of Election Irregularities
  • State Appeals School-Choice Program Ruling to Tennessee Supreme Court
  • Majority Of Adults In UK Say Black Lives Matter Movement Increased Racial Tensions, Poll Shows
  • Supreme Court Won't Get Involved in Louisiana Pastor's Case
  • Supreme Court rejects petition from Louisiana pastor facing charges for violating ban on large gatherings
  • Supreme Court won't get involved in Louisiana pastor's case
  • Supreme Court wont get involved in Louisiana pastors case
  • Emmanuel Tagoe defeats Mason Menard by majority decision
  • Former Georgia Supreme Court Chief Justice Dies From Virus
  • Capehart: Trump Motivates Dem Voters Who Want to Rid Themselves of This Man
  • Teen Mom fans slam Farrah Abraham’s ‘bizarre’ Thanksgiving TikTok after it takes an ‘odd turn’ with ‘corrupt media’ talk
  • Supreme Court blocks NY virus restrictions for houses of worship
  • GOP Rep. Brooks: Biden Did Not Win the Electoral College if Vote Limited to Lawful Votes Cast
  • Problematic for Our Youth: Gilles Simon Slams French Tennis for Wasting Energy on Replicating Roger Federer
  • Abbreviated Pundit Roundup: When the conspiracy comes home to roost
  • Supreme Court religious group ruling sets new personal tone for disputes between justices
  • Grand Slam box ticked, Thiem targets Tokyo podium