This news has been received from: New York Post

All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.

More On: amazon Parler CEO says calls to silence his app are ‘evil’ Amazon slams Parler for failing to police death threat posts Alexa, send help: Bodybuilder says device saved his life Big Tech stocks plunge as backlash against Silicon Valley grows

BENGALURU – Inc has launched an online academy to train students for one of India’s most competitive college entrance tests, the e-commerce giant said on Wednesday, as it taps a boom in virtual learning during the COVID-19 pandemic.

“Amazon Academy”, available as a website and an Android smartphone app, will offer learning material, live lectures and assessments to help students prepare for the Joint Entrance Examination (JEE), which allows entry into top engineering schools across India.

Content on the platform is currently available free and will remain free for “the next few months”, Amazon India said in a statement.

Each year, close to two million aspirants to coveted undergraduate engineering courses take the government-run JEE, for which some take additional classes with private tutors. Many of those tuition centers have either moved online or shut during the pandemic.

India has seen a boom in online education, or ed-tech, a market which has only expanded as the pandemic forced schools to close.

The country’s online education market for grades 1 to 12 should expand six-fold to $1.7 billion by 2022, while the market for students beyond grade 12 is set to nearly quadruple to $1.8 billion, consultancy RedSeer estimates.

Indian ed-tech startups including Unacademy, Vedantu and market leader BYJU’s raised $2.22 billion in 2020, about four times the amount raised a year earlier, according to the Indian Private Equity and Venture Capital Association and PGA Labs.

BYJU’s, backed by US investment firm Tiger Global and SoftBank-backed Unacademy raised the most capital last year, at $1.35 billion and $264 million, respectively.

Filed under amazon ,  Coronavirus ,  engineering ,  india ,  online education ,  1/13/21

News Source: New York Post

Tags: search amazon amazon engineering india online education online academy online education the pandemic amazon india

De Blasio, council aim to kick restaurants while their down

Next News:

EXPLAINER: Why Indias farmers are revolting against PM Modi

NEW DELHI (AP) — A sea of tens of thousands of farmers riding tractors and horses stormed India’s historic Red Fort this week — a dramatic escalation of their protests, which are posing a major challenge to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government.

The AP explains what is at the heart of two months of demonstrations and what it means for Modi’s government.


Most of the protesters are farmers from northern Punjab and Haryana states, the two biggest agricultural producers. They are demanding the repeal of laws passed by Parliament in September that they say will favor large corporate farms, devastate the earnings of many farmers and leave those who hold small plots behind as big corporations win out. Modi has billed the laws as necessary to modernize Indian farming.

Because of the demographics of Punjab and Haryana, many of the protesters in New Delhi happen to be from India’s minority Sikh religion, though their grievances are rooted in economic issues, not religious ones. Protests are also happening in other parts of the country among Indians of other backgrounds.

In recent weeks, people who are not farmers have also joined in, and the protests gained momentum in November when the farmers tried to march into New Delhi but were stopped by police. Since then, they have promised to hunker down at the edge of the city until the laws are repealed.



At the heart of these protests are Indian farmers’ fears that the government’s moves to introduce market reforms to the farming sector will leave them poorer — at a time when they are already frustrated over their declining clout as the government aims to turn India into a hub for global corporations.

The new legislation is not clear on whether the government will continue to guarantee prices for certain essential crops — a system that was introduced in the 1960s to help India shore up its food reserves and prevent shortages.

While the government has said it is willing to pledge the guaranteed prices will continue, the farmers are skeptical and want new legislation that says such prices are their legal right.

Farmers also fear that the legislation signals the government is moving away from a system in which an overwhelming majority of farmers sell only to government-sanctioned marketplaces. They worry this will leave them at the mercy of corporations that will have no legal obligation to pay them the guaranteed price anymore.

The government argues that this is designed to give farmers more choice in who to sell their produce to.

Clauses in the legislation also prevent farmers from taking contract disputes to courts, leaving them with no independent means of redress apart from government-appointed bureaucrats.

These perceived threats to their income terrify India’s farmers, who are mostly smallholders: A staggering 68% of them own less than 1 hectare of land. In some states, farming families earn just 20,000 rupees ($271) on average annually. ___


Farmers form the most influential voting bloc in India — and are often romanticized as the heart and soul of the nation.

Politicians have long considered it unwise to alienate them, and farmers are also particularly important to Modi’s base. Northern Haryana and few other states with substantial farmer populations are ruled by his party.

Since the legislation was passed, Modi’s government has lost two political alliance partners and some of his own leaders are cautioning him to tread carefully.

The protests against the Modi government are the biggest since he first came to power in 2014. They come at a time when the country’s economy has tanked, social strife has widened, protests have erupted against laws some deem discriminatory and the government has been questioned over its response to the coronavirus pandemic.



The Modi government says the legislation will benefit farmers by boosting production through private investment.

The government has offered to amend the laws and suspend their implementation for 18 months — but that has not satisfied farmers who want a full repeal.

Modi’s government also initially tried to discredit the Sikh farmers by dismissing their concerns as motivated by religious nationalism. Some leaders in Modi’s party called them “Khalistanis,” a reference to a movement for an independent Sikh homeland called “Khalistan” in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

Under Modi, India has seen a rising tide of Hindu nationalism that has rankled minority groups, mostly Muslims. Some leaders from Modi’s party and India’s freewheeling TV channels, which have long favored government’s Hindu nationalistic policies, have called the farmers “anti-national,” a label often given to those who criticize Modi or his policies.

But such allegations appear to have backfired, further angering the farmers, many of whose family members serve in the Indian army, police and civil service. Since then, common citizens also joined them, and the protests have gathered strength.



While this is a major challenge to his government, Modi’s popularity is still soaring and his approval ratings remain high because of his Hindu-nationalist policies.

Many agriculture experts agree that the Indian farming sector needs reforms, but they question the way the Modi government introduced the laws and the corporate involvement in agriculture.

“Leaving farmers to the mercy of the markets would be like a death sentence to them,” said Devinder Sharma, an agriculture expert who has spent the last two decades campaigning for income equality for Indian farmers. “We are talking about people who feed us.”

Critics also highlight what they see as the Modi government’s tendency to push through reforms without building consensus. When the laws were passed in Parliament, Modi’s party refused to extend the debate over it despite repeated requests from the opposition. It also denied referring the laws to a special committee, where members could further discuss them.

Copyright © 2021 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, written or redistributed.

Other News

  • Marion Wiesels virtual 90th birthday packed with VIPs
  • Academy Award-Winning Film, TV Actress And Northwestern Alum Cloris Leachman Dead At 94
  • Stars to celebrate Marion Wiesels 90th birthday
  • Academy Award-Winning Film, TV Actress Cloris Leachman Dead At 94
  • Chicago schools abandon reopening plan after unions COVID-19 pushback
  • Top Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades: DraftKings, Kohl’s, Mastercard, Texas Instruments, 3M, Ulta, Under Armour and More
  • Dwayne Johnson opens up about complicated, tough relationship with father
  • Thomas Tuchel challenges Chelsea youngsters and academy stars to help club win Premier League titles and trophies
  • ByteDance slashes jobs in India amid ongoing TikTok ban
  • Boyle Heights pizza pies with a slice of neighborhood history
  • Hungarian FM in Ukraine to push for ethnic minority rights
  • A college degree provides opportunity in our most essential industries
  • Soorarai Pottru: Suriya’s Drama Movie Enters the Oscars Race, Made Available in the Academy Screening Room
  • Tennessee Education Commissioner Penny Schwinn Warns Metro Nashville Public Schools on Federal Funds
  • Master: Thalapathy Vijay’s Blockbuster Film To Premiere On Amazon Prime Video On January 29
  • Md. Board of Education denies Montgomery Co. request to cancel school days before in-person learning resumes
  • Biden Education Nominee Opposes School Reopening Despite CDC Finding In-Person Learning Safe
  • Keystone Oaks Education Association Announces Intention To Strike If New Contract Is Not Reached
  • Report: Bidens Campaign Benefited from Record Amount of Dark Money