This news has been received from: FOX News

All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.

California churches scored a big win earlier this month in their fight against Gov. Gavin Newsom’s COVID-19 restrictions on church gatherings. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of San Bernardino and Riverside County churches that challenged the governor’s restrictions on in-person church services.

 

Fighting on behalf of those churches was the Center for American Liberty, a Virginia-based legal group, in conjunction with the Bay Area Dhillon Law Group. Founded in 2018 by attorney Harmeet Dhillon, the Center for American Liberty has taken on numerous cases – two of which have gone to the U.S. Supreme Court – fighting for free speech and civil liberties.

Center for American Liberty founder Harmeet Dhillon delivering the invocation in Punjabi and English at the start of the second session at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, Ohio, U.S. July 19, 2016.  (Reuters)

Gish v. Newsom was the first lawsuit filed challenging the state’s shelter-in-place orders amid the pandemic. The Center for American Liberty has risen to prominence in the last year, with dozens of lawsuits filed against the state for its COVID response that has closed businesses, churches and beaches, restricted people’s movements, and produced record-high unemployment.

The group’s current cases are tackling First and Second Amendment rights, religious liberties and school closures, among other civil liberty issues.

Givens v. Newsom was filed on behalf of plaintiffs who have argued that Newsom’s executive orders, issued in March 2020, did not exempt demonstrations, protests or other First Amendment-protected activities from enforcement.

Brach v. Newsom was filed on behalf of plaintiffs who are challenging the governor’s order barring in-classroom education in some 32 counties, a decision that affects 80% of the state’s children.

Center for American Liberty v. CHHS was filed last fall amid the California Health and Human Services Agency’s refusal to make public the data Newsom’s administration is using to consider its COVID-19 policies. State health officials have said the complex set of measurements on which they rely would confuse and potentially mislead the public if they were made available.

The Center for American Liberty says it sued the CHHS for its refusal "to produce these public records claiming the agency’s interest in nondisclosure outweighs the public’s interest in disclosure."

"After multiple good faith attempts to remind CHHS of its duty of transparency under state law, the Center for American Liberty sued CHHS in state court," the group said on its website.

Another high-profile civil liberties case the group is currently working on is Ngo v. Rose City Antifa. The case – which was its first – centers on the far-left group that former President Donald Trump deemed a "domestic terrorist group" and independent journalist Andy Ngo. The lawsuit accuses Antifa of threatening and assaulting Ngo for his "unfavorable coverage" of the militants.

YING MA: CALIFORNIA VS. 'WOKENESS' -- HERE'S HOW BELIEVERS IN EQUALITY FOUGHT BACK AND WON

Mark Trammell, executive director of the Center for American Liberty, told Fox News the group was created because its founders recognized that there was a "void" in the civil liberties and civil rights sphere.

"You had legacy groups in this area that have unfortunately left behind millions of Americans with little to no opportunity for quality representation," Trammell said.

The pandemic, Trammell said, catapulted the organization from being a mere start-up to "really leading the charge to restore civil liberties."

Though much of the group’s work has dealt with religious liberties, Trammell does not consider the Center for American Liberty a partisan organization, noting that even its founding members do not see eye to eye on every issue.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

"This is about the principle of free speech and it doesn’t matter what your viewpoint is. We will represent you. Because if one person is denied the right to speak freely because of their viewpoint, that means anyone can … it’s about the principle of free speech and defending that principle zealously."

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Bradford Betz is an editor for Fox News. Follow him on Twitter @bradford_betz.

News Source: FOX News

Tags: security innovation computers video games military tech careers security innovation computers video games military tech careers the governor’s the group’s the group’s the state’s executive director harmeet dhillon civil liberties restrictions challenging supreme court the pandemic the pandemic interest

Armed cops smash ‘rent-a-gun’ gang as 350 officers swoop in dawn raids across London, Essex and Kent

Next News:

March 3: ON THIS DAY in 1954, Eisenhower raps Mcarthy, comes to defense of Zwicker

ON THIS DAY IN 1932, the Brooklyn Daily Eagle reported, “Two outstanding psychiatrists disagreed today as to what type of individual kidnaped the Lindbergh baby and the motive for the kidnaping. Both agreed, however, that the child is safe and will be returned. Dr. Louis J. Bragman of the College of Medicine of Syracuse University, according to the Associated Press, held for the thrill of kidnaping the famous son of a famous father. Dr. Arthur F. Payne, Manhattan psychologist, believed, on the other hand, that the kidnaping was the work of a racketeer or a gang of racketeers, and that the objective was merely the ransom money. Dr. Payne said, ‘The child comes of good, healthy stock and no harm will come to it as the result of its stay in strangers’ hands.’”

***

ON THIS DAY IN 1953, the Eagle reported, “ROCHESTER (U.P.) — America’s oldest soldier was slowly ‘fading away’ today. James A. Hard, 111 years old and one of the two surviving Union Army veterans of the Civil War, was fighting what might be his last battle — this one for his life. He won a battle with death yesterday when his right leg was amputated above the knee. But hospital authorities said that due to his age he could ‘still go at any time.’ … Hard fought his first battles at Bull Run, Antietam, Chancellorsville and Fredericksburg. ‘Lincoln once told me I’d make a good soldier,’ the grizzled veteran has said. ‘I did, too.’ Hard met Lincoln three times, once right after the Civil War started and twice later when the President reviewed Union troops. The only other surviving Union veteran of the Civil War is Albert Woolson, 106, of Duluth. Woolson and Hard met last at the 83rd Grand Army of the Republic encampment in Indianapolis in September 1949.”

Other News

  • Judge Andrew P. Napolitano: Silencing free speech -- when the First Amendment is not enforced, this can happen
  • MSNBCs Glaude: GOP Assault on Voting Rights Part of the Cold Civil War
  • Civil suit in U.S. over British teens death can proceed
  • Reparations would be unjust and tear our nation apart
  • Sixty detainees in an anti-drug operation in Huelva, Seville and Cádiz
  • Entertainment Studios acquires rights to ‘From Selma to Sorrow: The Life and Death of Viola Liuzzo
  • Heres whos Biden is now considering for budget chief
  • Provisional prison for the four detained for a group rape of a woman in Gran Canaria
  • Civil Suit in U.S. Over British Teen's Death Can Proceed
  • Democracy, Liberty Declining Worldwide, Freedom House Report Finds
  • Jesse Jackson released from hospital after 3-week stay: I was unable to walk
  • Worldwide Democracy, Liberty Declining, Freedom House Report Finds
  • Civil Rights Icon Calls White Wokeness Insulting to Black Americans
  • Capitol RiotsTrump Served With Civil Rights Lawsuit After Capitol Riot
  • Selma Bridge Crossing Jubilee to Honor Civil Rights Icons
  • Selma Bridge Crossing Jubilee to honor civil rights icons
  • Kentucky Officer Fatally Shoots Man During Traffic Stop
  • Civil engineers give US infrastructure a C-
  • Distillery Filling First New Warehouse on Site in Decades