Feb 23, 2021
GOP puts NIH on hot seat with call for investigation into US funding to Wuhan lab
This news has been received from: washingtonexaminer.com
All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.
More than two dozen Republican House members demanded the Health and Human Services Department's independent watchdog investigate the National Institutes of Health’s response to concerns raised about taxpayer-funded research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, one of the potential origins of the coronavirus pandemic.
GOP members called for a “prompt and thorough investigation into the NIH’s response to biosafety concerns” at the Wuhan lab, asking HHS Principal Deputy Inspector General Christi Grimm to look into what funding the Wuhan lab received from the United States in the past, if the lab was still eligible for U.S. taxpayer support, and whether U.S. funding continued.
Peter Daszak, a member of the World Health Organization’s coronavirus origins investigative team who worked with the Wuhan lab for years and helped steer NIH funding to it for bat coronavirus research through his EcoHealth Alliance, criticized the Biden administration for appearing skeptical of the WHO’s preliminary findings following two weeks of investigation in Wuhan, the city where the novel coronavirus was first detected, and defended China to Chinese Communist Party-linked outlets.
Republicans pointed to a “growing belief among experts, including the U.S. State Department, that the pandemic ... may have been caused by dangerous coronavirus research gone awry at the Chinese Communist Party-run bioagent laboratory.” U.S. Embassy officials in China raised concerns in 2018 about biosecurity at the Wuhan lab.
“We are gravely concerned about the NIH’s relationship with both EcoHealth and WIV, and the Agency’s handling of allegations that the COVID-19 pandemic was potentially caused by an NIH-funded laboratory at WIV,” the GOP members said. “We also are alarmed that WIV is eligible to receive additional funding from the NIH through 2024.”
The GOP asked the HHS watchdog to investigate when NIH was first aware that coronavirus experiments were conducted at the Wuhan lab, if NIH officials reviewed the Wuhan lab’s experiments to assess compliance with HHS’s pandemic guidelines, when the NIH became aware of biosafety concerns, and whether NIH officials communicated with EcoHealth Alliance or the lab to coordinate messaging to respond to the lab leak hypothesis. The lawmakers asked when the Wuhan lab’s eligibility to receive NIH funding ends, if it is currently receiving NIH support, and how much NIH funding it had gotten.
The HHS inspector general's office did not immediately respond to the Washington Examiner's request for comment in response to the letter, which had a list of signatories led by Reps. Scott Perry of Pennsylvania and Nancy Mace of South Carolina.
China denies COVID-19 came from the lab, questions whether it even originated in China, and has pushed conspiracy theories about the novel coronavirus originating on frozen food or with the U.S. military.
CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF HUMAN ERROR 'FAR OUTWEIGHS' NATURAL OUTBREAK OF COVID-19
Matthew Pottinger, deputy national security adviser under former President Donald Trump, argued the “circumstantial evidence” that COVID-19 originated through human error, such as an accidental Wuhan lab escape, “far outweighs” the evidence that it was a natural outbreak. He added, “We have very strong reason to believe that the Chinese military was doing secret classified animal experiments in that same laboratory.” A State Department fact sheet noted the Wuhan lab “has a published record of conducting ‘gain-of-function’ research to engineer chimeric viruses.”
White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan criticized China for blocking coronavirus data but declined to stand by the declassified U.S. intelligence.
EcoHealth Alliance received at least $3.4 million from 2014 to 2019 and funded research at the Wuhan lab. NIH told the Washington Examiner the Wuhan lab is not an NIH grantee but that EcoHealth Alliance received NIH grants then provided a sub-award to the Wuhan lab. The agency said its relationship “is with the primary recipient of NIH funding,” such as EcoHealth Alliance, and “not with the recipient of subawards” such as the Wuhan lab. NIH said it “does not participate in establishing the terms of the subaward” and the grant recipient "is directly accountable for the performance of the project.”
The agency said the grant to EcoHealth Alliance was terminated April 24 but reinstated July 8, though “all activities related to the grant were immediately suspended until EcoHealth Alliance provides information and documentation demonstrating that EcoHealth Alliance and WIV have satisfied concerns NIH has about non-compliance” with award requirements.
"After a careful review of the grant, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases determined the research in the grant was not gain-of-function research because it did not involve the enhancement of the pathogenicity or transmissibility of the viruses studied," NIH said, adding that this research was not subject to its “gain-of-function research funding pause” or framework on research funding.
The Wuhan lab maintains a Foreign Assurance with NIH’s Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare. NIH told the Washington Examiner that “an Assurance does not determine whether an organization can or will receive a grant,” but that means, the agency said, the Wuhan lab is in compliance with NIH’s policy on using lab animals.
Jen Psaki, Biden's press secretary, was asked Tuesday whether gain-of-function research facilities such as the Wuhan lab should be eligible for U.S. funding.
“We support a robust international investigation [into the origins of the coronavirus pandemic]. We also have taken steps in the State Department to ensure we have full staffing in our Beijing embassy to ensure we have eyes and ears on the ground,” Psaki replied. “There’s no funding anticipated or planned to go to that [Wuhan] facility at this time, so I don’t have any additional updates beyond that.”
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
NIH did not immediately respond to the Washington Examiner’s questions about the Wuhan lab receiving U.S. funds and whether U.S. intelligence assessments on the coronavirus origins has any bearing on any relevant decisions.
WHO team leader Peter Ben Embarek said this month the possibility that the coronavirus may have escaped from the Wuhan lab didn’t merit further inquiry, stressing a jump from an animal to another animal to humans was most likely. But WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said more study on the lab leak hypothesis was needed.
Pottinger criticized the WHO, arguing that “when it comes to this investigation into the origins, unfortunately, we're seeing a panel that's been sent to China that is deeply conflicted."
News Source: washingtonexaminer.com
Tags: states states news joe biden donald trump china coronavirus intelligence intelligence community nih the wuhan lab’s national security adviser chinese communist party wuhan lab’s investigation into with nih’s the nih’s the novel coronavirus coronavirus research coronavirus origins state department the wuhan lab investigation eligible for u into the origins the agency said and whether u the agency said compliance criticized at the chinese the wuhan lab institute donald trump recipient response gop members
Ex-Trump aide Pierson wont run for Dallas-area House seat
Katrina Pierson, a former top aide to Donald TrumpDonald TrumpProsecutors focus Trump Organization probe on company's financial officer: report WHO official says it's 'premature' to think pandemic will be over by end of year Romney released from hospital after fall over the weekend MORE’s presidential campaigns, announced Tuesday she will not run for an open House seat in Texas after she laid the groundwork for a bid.
“I am humbled by the outpouring of support/encouragement of so many fellow Texans, Rep leaders & especially the Trump family! I have decided that I have a greater responsibility to #TakeBackTheHouse I’m not running in TX6, but I’m not closing the door on Congress - stay tuned!” Pierson tweeted.
I am humbled by the outpouring of support/encouragement of so many fellow Texans, Rep leaders & especially the Trump family! I have decided that I have a greater responsibility to #TakeBackTheHouse
I’m not running in TX6, but I’m not closing the door on Congress - stay tuned!
The former Trump staffer had taken steps to run for the House seat in Texas’s 6th District, which was left vacant by the late Rep. Ron WrightRon WrightAnti-Trump Republican will seek Texas seat Ex-Trump aide Pierson planning run for Congress Susan Wright, wife of Texas congressman who died of COVID-19, announces run for seat MORE (R-Texas), who died from the coronavirus last month.
Pierson rose to prominence as a high-profile Tea Party activist and ultimately served as a spokesperson for Trump’s 2016 campaign and as top adviser for his reelection effort last year. She reportedly had talks with a top Republican consulting firm about plans to jump into the race for the Dallas-area seat.
Her decision to pass on a shot at the House seat is likely a relief for the other Republicans in the field. Sources familiar with her thinking had told The Hill they expected her to get Trump’s endorsement, a major boon in any GOP primary field.
Among the other Republicans running are Susan Wright, Ron Wright’s widow; Sery Kim, who worked in the Department of Health and Human Services during the first year of the Trump administration; and state Rep. Jake Ellzey.
Candidates have until Wednesday to file paperwork to formally run. The special election to replace Wright will take place on May 1.Tags Katrina Pierson Ron Wright Donald J. Trump Donald Trump