This news has been received from: mercurynews.com

All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.

Submit your letter to the editor via this form. Read more Letters to the Editor.

Legislature should
pass fracking ban

There is new legislation that would ban fracking in California by 2027, Senate Bill 467. I hope that it will become law because fracking pollutes both the air and water.

It has caused health problems in American Indians, African-Americans and Latinos because they live near the wells where fracking occurs.

This is environmental racism at its worst.

I urge the state legislators to pass this bill so fracking will be no more.

Billy Trice
Oakland

Consider teachers’ needs
for safe schools reopening

As a teacher, it’s frustrating to keep reading editorials insisting that schools can reopen safely and blaming the delay in reopening on teachers’ stubbornness or ignorance.

Teachers know school districts can reopen in a manner that’s safe for teachers, we just don’t believe they will. Teachers have grown accustomed to having their needs considered least, yet getting the most blame when problems arise in education.

We desperately want to be back in our classrooms interacting with our students in-person, but with the assurance that our districts are doing everything they can to keep us safe, not the bare minimum. Just this once, school districts, politicians, and the public should take teachers’ concerns seriously and take meaningful steps to protect our health and the health of the people whom we live with and care for.

Joel Swett
Brentwood

Alameda needs more
police and social services

After taking the community survey regarding Unbundling Services for Policing and Racial Equity, I recommend that all citizens do the same. This boilerplate report looks to be final and not just a draft. With due respect for the community committee that put this report together, I find the major concern to be the recommendation to cut the level of police officers in Alameda and to “Reimagine Public Safety”.

The number of Alameda Police officers is low. This is not acceptable to our citizens. There have been scores of robberies, car thefts, and shootings in our town. We must fully staff the police department to provide for our public safety.

The mental health/social justice services must also be included to ensure Alameda citizens’ public safety. Both issues should be the mayor’s and council’s priority.

Don Sheratt
Alameda

Will GOP finally put
Trump in rearview?

The Republican Party ignored how Trump tore apart America with his constant lies, tyrannical vindictiveness and unremitting vileness. Now that he is doing the same thing to the Republican Party with his constant lies, tyrannical vindictiveness and unremitting vileness, the GOP leadership is aghast and scrambling.

It is, however, tragic that the GOP did not have as much regard for our country as it does for its own political futures. But perhaps this will finally show the GOP the imperative of having Trump fade into the rearview mirror, this time for the good of the country as a whole.

Eliot Hudson
Lafayette

Senate should oppose
Vilsack nomination

Tom Vilsack’s nomination as secretary of agriculture doesn’t belong within Joe Biden’s progressive agenda.

Vilsack has served as governor of Iowa, secretary of agriculture under President Obama, and chief lobbyist for the dairy industry. His candidacy is opposed by a vast coalition of small and minority farmers, as well as consumer, labor, and environmental advocates. Here’s why:

  • He presided over consolidation of Big Ag to take unfair advantage of small farmers.
  • He failed to protect minority farmers and farmworkers from exploitation by Big Ag.
  • He supported location of highly polluting factory farms in minority communities.
  • He promoted approval of numerous genetically modified food products.
  • He allowed meatpacking employees to replace government food safety inspectors.
  • He serves as a highly paid lobbyist for the dairy industry, a significant factor in the climate crisis.

Our senators must oppose Tom Vilsack’s nomination as secretary of agriculture.

Jeff Garner
Walnut Creek

Trump, Limbaugh took
similar tolls on U.S.

Donald Trump and Rush Limbaugh exhibited many similarities, far beyond being corpulent, white, male multimillionaires.

Both wielded unlimited power to shape public opinion. Trump enjoyed the bully pulpit of the presidency and unrestricted access to social media. Limbaugh’s show aired on more than 600 radio stations from coast to coast.

Both Trump and Limbaugh eschewed long-established norms of truth, honesty, civility and fairness. Both targeted Democrats, liberals, racial and religious minorities, immigrants, LGBT folks, and the disabled.

Related Articles

  • Letters: Masks in Pleasanton | Reliable grids | Mars money
  • Letters: Los Altos housing | Bad timing | Wrong place |
  • Letters: High school sports | End debate | Hire more police | Animal welfare | Shrewd but cowardly
  • Letters: End the debate | Rate hike | Public utilities | Power shutoffs | Righteous acquittal
  • Letters: Seamless CVS | Indict Trump | Whose apology? | Iran’s crimes | Public schools
Both relied heavily on insults, ridicule and name-calling, rather than reasoned intelligent debate.

Both exhibited paranoia, narcissism, egotism and bigotry.

Both acquired millions of followers, whose devotion to their idol echoed that of past religious cults.

Both Trump and Limbaugh had a major impact on American society, and it was not positive.

Burt Bogardus
Danville

News Source: mercurynews.com

Tags: mr roadshow cartoons pac 12 hotline celebrities mr roadshow cartoons pac 12 hotline celebrities coronavirus coronavirus closures donald trump environment joe biden k 12 education letters natural gas oil politics republicans senate tom vilsack’s the republican party the republican party school districts police officers public safety the community ban fracking more police

Loyalists pull support for NI peace deal over Brexit rules

Next News:

Commentary: Promoting Myths About Police Won’t Make Us Safer

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
by Jason Johnson

 

The House of Representatives passed the “George Floyd Justice in Policing Act of 2021” this week, the bill’s proponents rightly decry pernicious stereotyping and generalizing based on race.

Yet many of those who rightly condemn such dangerous biases, and the lies they are built upon, make misleading claims of their own to advance another reckless bigotry — anti-police bias.

To make the case for their version of police reform, the bill’s advocates are misleading Americans about the over 800,000 law enforcement officers in the United States and their often dangerous work.

Upon the re-introduction of the Democrats’ policing reform bill in late February, Speaker Nancy Pelosi said, “the epidemic of police brutality continues – with more police killings occurring last year than in the year before, and with communities of color and vulnerable groups disproportionately bearing the brunt of this cruelty.”

The ACLU even titled a report “The Other Epidemic: Fatal Police Shootings in the Time of Covid-19.” In 2019, Sen. Bernie Sanders warned a questioner to respect the police “so you don’t get shot in the back of the head.” And “Squad” member, Rep. Ayanna Pressley tweeted, “police brutality is the 6th leading cause of death for young Black men.”

Others frequently malign law enforcement as “systematically” racist, brutal, and cruel, and suggest the trend is getting worse.

That none of these statements are fair, true, or wise seems irrelevant to those who are ideologically hostile to the police. And such misinformation is taking a toll on public perception.

A 2020 AP-NORC poll showed that fully 48% of the public believes police violence against the public is an “extremely or very serious problem” — up from 32% in 2015.

That shift is particularly dramatic among Democrats and left-wing voters, whose leaders peddle these claims about police. The result is that, according to a February 2021 survey by Skeptic Magazine, about half of liberal or very liberal voters believe 1,000 or more “unarmed black men” are killed by police annually. The true figure is less than 2% of that.

But such myths warp the public perceptions across the ideological spectrum — with conservatives and moderates both believing that 40% of police killings are of Black Americans. (Liberals believe it to be almost 60%.) In fact, Black people represent less than 24% of fatal law enforcement shootings.

The reality is that police use of force is rare and getting rarer. Over 99.9% of all police calls are resolved peacefully, with no use of force whatsoever. Ninety-five percent of police officers will go their entire (often decades long) career without discharging their weapon at another person at all.

The largest police force in the U.S., the NYPD, has seen police shootings decline by 90% in the past few decades. In 1971, NYPD officers fired their guns 810 times, killing 93 suspects but in 2019, New York’s Finest discharged their weapons 57 times, killing 11 individuals.

Simply put, cops aren’t wantonly killing Americans of any race. Over 75% of those killed by police wielded a gun or a knife, while most of the rest possessed other weapons. More than twice as many whites were killed than Blacks. And research shows that white officers shoot Black suspects at lower rates than non-white officers.

Police shootings are not the 6th leading cause of death for young Black men (44 and under) according to the CDC. Diabetes, heart disease, accidents, suicide, cancers, and strokes all kill at higher rates. In fact, officer involved deaths represent only 1% of all young African-American deaths – nearly the precisely same share as for young white men. On the other hand, homicide is by far the leading cause of mortality for young black men aged 15-34, comprising 40% of all deaths.

And Americans, especially the Black community, don’t want to defund the police. Actually, they often want more police to protect them from violence and crime. A 2020 Gallup survey showed that 92% of inner-city Black residents want more or the same amount of police presence in their neighborhoods, not less. Meanwhile, 72% of Black Americans are satisfied with their local police, compared to 71% of all Americans.

Americans overwhelmingly oppose “defunding the police” with 73% of those polled wanting funding maintained (42%) or increased (31%), with 55% of Black Americans wishing to see funding maintained or increased.

And this support is for good reason. Police reduce crime and their absence gives criminals space to wreak havoc. In 2020 homicides jumped 21% and aggravated assaults rose 8.3% as elected officials ordered police to “stand down.” In New York City, arrests plummeted 55% over the summer while murder increased 45%. Similarly, de-policing in Chicago (2016) and Baltimore (2015) saw arrests fall by a quarter while homicide spiked by 59% (Chicago) and 55% (Baltimore) in the following months.

More and better policing also pays dividends. One study calculated that for every $1 a city spent on police, municipal revenues and economic growth rose by $1.63. Safer communities attract investment, grow jobs, and encourage taxpayers to move in and stay.

The brave men and women of law enforcement — 59 of whom were killed feloniously on duty in 2020 — selflessly protect and serve. We should support, empower, and professionalize — through greater training and accountability — American law enforcement officers, not slander them.

It’s time to stop the falsehoods and fear-mongering. The public deserves the truth on policing.

– – –

Jason Johnson, a former deputy commissioner of the Baltimore Police Department, is president of the Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Content created by RealClearPolicy is available without charge to any eligible news publisher. For republishing terms, please contact [email protected].

Other News

  • Bill to rebuild trust between immigrants and law enforcement
  • Letters: No rate hikes | Premature outrage | HSR crucial | Continued caution | Voting rules | Letting Biden off
  • Florida ‘anti-mob’ bill racing through House, unheard in Senate
  • Letters: Inadequate housing | Conservation efforts | COVID quagmire | Racism persists | COVID funds
  • Letters to the Editor — March 6, 2021
  • Black Law Enforcement Leaders Discuss Minnesota Policing
  • Poll: 84 Percent of Americans Oppose Disney Filming Mulan in Chinese Region With Uyghur Concentration Camps
  • Massachusetts Adds 3 States To COVID-19 Travel Order Exempt List
  • Police Officer Hit by Motorcyclist Feeling Law Enforcement
  • Kentucky bill would make it a crime to insult a police officer
  • Law Enforcement Surround Home In Burgettstown, Man Eventually Taken Into Custody
  • Cost of borrowing 10-year US bonds in the repo market is negative for the fifth session
  • Holiday blow to Cyprus family trips as teenagers NOT included in restriction-free travel
  • Officials Recover 150 Missing Children During Operation in Tennessee: We Cant Give Up
  • American Academy of Arts and Letters Expands, Diversifies
  • American Academy of Arts and Letters expands, diversifies
  • Word Game: March 5, 2021
  • WVa Launches Seat Belt, Child Restraint Enforcement Campaign
  • What is the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act?